Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ga. 654 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Smith v. State (1986), Ponder v. State (1991)

94 state decisions

42019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brown v. State · Castell v. Kemp · Simpson v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is a requisite of a sound system of criminal justice, serving alike the proper ends of defendants and of the public, that any contention concerning the violation of the constitutional right of counsel should be made at the earliest practicable moment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “remand the case to the trial court for a hearing and appropriate findings concerning the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) when appellate counsel failed to file a motion for new trial, [Cit.]; (b) when appellate counsel filed a motion for new trial but failed to raise the ineffectiveness issue, [Cit.]; and (c) when appellate counsel was retained for the first time during the pendency of the appeal. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.