Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ga. App. 497 - Wilson v. State

255 Ga. App. 497 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tarvestad v. State · 245 Ga. App. 294 - Turner v. State · 234 Ga. App. 13 - Medina v. State · 154 Ga. App. 620 - Chambers v. State · 194 Ga. App. 790 - Holder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that if a defendant fails to object to a charge when asked if he has any objections, and fails to reserve objections, he has waived appellate review of the charge as given. [Cit.] The only exception to this rule is set forth in OCGA § 5-5-24 (c): when a substantial error in the charge exists that is harmful as a matter of law, it may be reviewed regardless of whether objection was made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to satisfy this standard, appellant must show that the allegedly erroneous charge was blatantly apparent and prejudicial to the extent that it raises a question whether he has been deprived, to some extent, of a fair trial. Nothing is presented for consideration on appeal unless a gross miscarriage of justice attributable to the jury charge is about to result. 6”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A person is not guilty of a crime, except murder, if the act upon which the supposed criminal liability is based is performed under such coercion that the person reasonably believes that performing the act is the only way to prevent his imminent death or great bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.