Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ga. App. 522 - Beasley v. State

255 Ga. App. 522 - Beasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrow v. State · Plaza Properties, Ltd. v. Prime Business Investments, Inc. · Lillard v. Head

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sole complaint goes to the Board’s calculation of credit on a legitimately entered sentence that is currently being legitimately served. Accordingly, [Maldonado’s] claim is cognizable only in a mandamus or injunction action against the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections or in a petition for habeas corpus, depending on what point in time in the service of [Maldonado’s] sentence any additional action may be filed. 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.