255 Ga. App. 663 - Sagenich v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bryant v. State · Fields v. State · Summage v. State · 245 Ga. App. 531 - Kent v. State · 233 Ga. App. 122 - Gabbard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The continuing witness rule has been applied to recordings as well as writings. This Court has held that the rule is violated when, for instance, the trial court sends the videotaped interview of a witness to the jury room, Summage v. State, [ 248 Ga. App. 559, 561 (1) ( 546 SE2d 910 ) (2001)], or allows a defendant’s tape-recorded statement to police to go to the jury room, Fields [v. State, 266 Ga. 241, 243 (2) ( 466 SE2d 202 ) (1996)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Documents that are prohibited by the “continuing witness rule” from going out with the jury include answers to written interrogatories, written dying declarations, and signed statements of guilt. These documents, which generally contain their makers’ assertions of purported truths, are ascribed evidentiary value only to the extent that their makers are credible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.