255 Ga. App. 781 - Prillaman v. Sark’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 229 Ga. App. 160 - Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc. · 235 Ga. App. 250 - Rubin v. Cello Corp. · 225 Ga. App. 889 - Young v. Brandt · 218 Ga. App. 48 - Styles v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 248 Ga. App. 194 - Herron v. Hollis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he knowledge requirement does not refer to a comprehension of general, non-specific risks. Rather, the knowledge that a plaintiff who assumes the risk must subjectively possess is that of the specific, particular risk of harm associated with the activity or condition that proximately causes injury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.