255 Ill. App. 3d 418 - Schryver v. Eriksen’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 208 Ill. App. 3d 644 - Barbour v. Fred Berglund & Sons, Inc. · 105 Ill. App. 3d 336 - Clinton v. Avello · 101 Ill. App. 3d 292 - Ashley v. Hill · 173 Ill. App. 3d 132 - Yedor v. Centre Properties, Inc. · 129 Ill. App. 3d 948 - Thielke v. Osman Construction Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[I]n cases of true misnomer there is no requirement that service of summons be effectuated upon the defendant within the applicable statute of limitations. There is no provision in section 2 — 401(b) requiring that a misnamed defendant be served within the limitations period. *** It is only in cases of mistaken identity that service upon the proper defendant is required prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.