Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ind. 183 - State v. Grow

State v. Grow’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Bradberry v. State (1977), Summerlin v. State (1971)

31 state decisions

17019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wedmore v. State · Colglazier v. State · State v. Mabrey · Norris v. State · State of Indiana Ex Rel. Demers v. Miami Circuit Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a change of venue from the county has been granted, we have held the time begins to run anew . . (our emphasis)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““DISCHARGE FOR DELAY IN CRIMINAL TRIALS ‘‘(A) Defendant in jail. No defendant shall be detained in jail on a charge, without a trial, for a continuous period embracing more than six [6] months from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge (whichever is later); except where a continuance toas had on his motion, or the delay was caused by his act, or where there was not sufficient time to try him during such period because of congestion of the court calendar; provided, however, that in the last-mentioned circumstance, the prosecuting attorney shall make such statement in a motion for continuance not later than ten [10] days prior to the date set for trial, or if such motion is filed less than ten [10] days prior to trial, the prosecuting attorney shall show additionally that the delay in filing the motion was not the fault of the prosecutor.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Defendant in jail. No defendant shall be detained in jail on a charge, without a trial, for a continuous period embracing more than six [6] months from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge (whichever is later) ; except where a continuance was had on his motion, or the delay was caused by his act, or where there was not sufficient time to try him during such period because of congestion of the court calendar . . .” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.