Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ind. 237 - Graham v. State

Graham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
January 1978
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stock v. State · McGill v. State · Fisher v. State · Croney v. State · Gennaitte v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Uttering is the offering of a forged instrument, knowing it to be such, with a representation that it is genuine, and with an intent to defraud. It is not essential that the accused should have been implicated in the forgery, that the instrument be accepted as genuine, or that anyone be actually prejudiced by it.’ 37 C. J. S., Forgery § 37, p. 57.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.