Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Ind. 365 - Stallings v. State

Stallings v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
March 1993
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 1993 · most notably Johnson v. State (1978), Young v. State (1971)

26 state decisions

140197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Christen v. State · Smith v. State · United States v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * General on-the-scene questioning as to facts surrounding a crime or other general questioning of citizens in the fact-finding process is not affected by our holding. It is an act of responsible citizenship for individuals to give whatever information they may have to aid in law enforcement. In such situations the compelling atmosphere inherent in the process of in-custody interrogation is not necessarily present."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"This court does not read Miranda as requiring officers to preface with a warning of non-coercive questioning conducted in the course of a routine investigation.... "... In the complete absence of the element of coercion, actual or potential, or police dominance of the individual's will, the mild police activity shown here should not prevent the introduction of statements freely made. The evils with which the Court was concerned in Miranda are not present here...." U.S. v. Gibson (4th Cir., 1968), 392 F.2d 373, 376 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.