Alcorn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Luckett v. State (1972), Teague v. State (1978)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. United States · United States v. Barone · Marshall v. United States · Haerr v. United States · Stock v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Under this rule, evidence concerning that which is in plain view is not the product of a search. United States v. Barone (2 Cir., 1964), 330 F.2d 543 ; Koscielski v. State, (1927), 199 Ind. 546 , 158 N.E. 902 . 6x ® (The word "search" connotes uncovering that which is hidden, prying into hidden places for that which is concealed. It is not a search to observe what is open to view.' McDonald v. United States (1948), 83 U.S.App.D.C. 96 , 166 F.2d 957 . In Marshall v. United States (1970), 422 F.2d 185 , the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that: 'A search implies an examination of one's premises or person with a view to the discovery of contraband or evidence of guilt to be used in prosecution of a criminal action. The term implies exploratory investigation or quest. Haerr v. United States, 5 Cir.1957, 240 F.2d 533, 535 .' In the case at bar there was no evidence of a 'prying into hidden places for that which is concealed,' or of an exploratory quest. Sergeant Shaw stated that while he was standing alongside appellant's car checking the latter's driver's license he, at the same time, (glanced in the back seat on the floor board' with his flashlight. (Emphasis supplied; Tr. p. 97.). By doing so, he observed the cartons of cigarettes, bakery goods, and bottles of liquor above referred to. 'We do not hold, of course, that every use of a flashlight is not a search. A probing, exploratory quest for evidence of crime is a search governed by Fourth Amendment standards whether a fl”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. State““ ‘A search implies an examination of one’s premises or person with a view to the discovery of contraband or evidence of guilt to be used in prosecution of a criminal action. The term implies exploratory investigation or quest. Haerr v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 240 F.2d 533, 535 .’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The word ‘search’ connotes uncovering that which is hidden, prying into hidden places for that which is concealed. It is not a search to observe what is open to view.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.