Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Kan. 21 - State v. MacK

State v. MacK’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably State v. Orr (1997), State v. Marquez (2009)

27 state decisions

130199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Rock v. Arkansas · Griffin v. United States · State v. Warren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An eyewitness identification due process determination is a mixed question of law and fact that should be reviewed de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.