State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Kelly (2014), State v. Gonzales (2009)
73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Alabama · State v. Dunn · State v. Bryant · State v. Andrews · State v. Nunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A hearing and appointment of counsel may be required for some motions to withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. However, if there is no substantial question of law or triable issue of fact and the files and records conclusively show that the defendant is not entitled to relief on the motion, then there is no requirement that a hearing be held or that counsel be appointed.” 255 Kan. 455 , Syl. ¶ 4.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] hearing on a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere is limited to those instances in which the defendant's motion raises substantial issues of fact or law and should be denied when the files and records conclusively show that the defendant is entitled to no relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘The burden of establishing incompetency of an attorney or ineffective assistance of counsel to the extent necessary to overcome the presumption of regularity of a conviction is upon the petitioner. [Citations omitted.] Mere conclusory contentions of a petitioner for which no evidentiary basis is stated or appears are not sufficient basis for relief from conviction. [Citation omitted.]’ ” State v. Jackson, 255 Kan. 455, 463 , 874 P.2d 1138 (1994) (quoting Burns v. State, 215 Kan. 497, 499-500 , 524 P.2d 737 [1974]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.