Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Kan. 464 - State v. Martinez

State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Gerstein v. Pugh · Szoboszlay v. Glessner · State v. Smolin · State v. Sherry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court of Appeals' conclusion concerning the application of K.S.A. 22-2609 is not supported by any authority. K.S.A. 22-2609, a venue statute, applies to all of the acts of theft set out in K.S.A. 21-3701. The holding in... Alvarez ... to the contrary is disapproved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “statute was not intended to expand that general rule by allowing one to be prosecuted for receiving stolen property in any county other than that where the property was allegedly received.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.