Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Kan. 694 - State v. Ball

State v. Ball’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2022

24 state decisions

1001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663

Relies on Hughey v. United States · State v. Cheun-Phon Ji · 13 Kan. App. 2d 417 - State v. Hinckley · United States v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In addition to any other conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program, the court shall order the defendant to comply with each of the following conditions: “(1) Make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by the defendant’s crime, in an amount and manner determined by the court and to the person specified by the court, unless the court finds compelling circumstances which would render a plan of restitution unworkable.” K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4610(d).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[W]henever any person has been found guilty of a crime, the court may adjudge any of the following: “(1) Commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary of corrections or, if confinement is for a term less than one year, to jail for the term provided by law; “(4) suspend the imposition of the sentence subject to such conditions as the court may deem appropriate, including orders requiring full or partial restitution. . . . “(5) assign the defendant to a community correctional services program subject to such conditions as the court may deem appropriate, including orders requiring full or partial restitution; “(9) impose any appropriate combination of subsections (b)(1) through (b)(8).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““When ... a defendant has been charged with numerous offenses and has agreed to plead guilty to one or more counts and pay restitution for each of the charged offenses in exchange for the State’s agreement to dismiss several charges . . . the sentencing court has authority to order the restitution provided in the plea agreement.” 255 Kan. at 701 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.