State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 district · 51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Lumley (1999), State v. Mincey (1998)
4 district · 51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gonzales · State v. Cheun-Phon Ji · State v. Holley · State v. Harrold · Noble v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 22-3602 grants a defendant an appeal ‘as a matter of right from any judgment against the defendant in the district court.’ However, that statute precludes appeals ‘from a judgment of conviction before a district judge upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, except that jurisdictional or other grounds going to the legality of the proceedings may be raised by the defendant as provided in K.S.A. 60-1507 and amendments thereto.’ “K.S.A. 22-3210(d) permits the trial court to set aside the judgment of conviction and allow a defendant to withdraw his or her plea of guilty or nolo contendere before sentencing for good cause shown or after sentencing to correct manifest injustice. This court has previously heard and decided direct appeals from a district court’s refusal to permit withdrawal of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without questioning jurisdiction. [Citations omitted.] Implicit in the legislature’s enactment of K.S.A. 22-3210(d), permitting withdrawal of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere independent of K.S.A. 60-1507, is the right to a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of a motion to withdraw plea. [Citations omitted.] . . . We hold K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 22-3602 does not preclude a defendant who has pleaded guilty or nolo contendere from taking a direct appeal from die district court’s denial of a motion to withdraw the plea. “This court has permitted direct appeals after a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. [Citations omitted.] Though these ”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Implicit in the legislature's enactment of K.S.A. 22-3210[d], permitting withdrawal of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere . . . is the right to a direct appeal from the trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Showalter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.