Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Kan. 79 - State v. Sodders

State v. Sodders’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably State v. Robinson (2006), State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY (1998)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 28 state decisions

140199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Gerstein v. Pugh · Michigan v. · Santoni v. United States · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Law enforcement officers employed by any city may exercise their powers as law enforcement officers: (a) Anywhere within the city limits of the city employing them and outside of such city when on property owned or under the control of such city; and (b) in any other place when a request for assistance has been made by law enforcement officers from that place or when in fresh pursuit of a person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A search warrant shall be issued in duplicate and shall be directed for execution to all law enforcement officers of the state, or to any law enforcement officer specifically named therein.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.