Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Kan. 953 - State v. Blockman

State v. Blockman’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lashley · State v. Long · State v. Getz · State v. Russell · 19 Kan. App. 2d 56 - State v. Blockman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As we concluded in Long , larceny is a crime against property. Robbery, however, is not only a crime against property but is also a crime against tire person. The gravamen of both offenses is the unlawful taking of the property. There may be larceny without robbery, but there can be no robbery without larceny.” 255 Kan. at 956 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]heft by threat, or extortion, is not a lesser included offense of robbery under the provisions of K.S.A. 21-3107(2)(a) or (d).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Robbery is the taking of property from the person or presence of another by force or by threat of bodily harm to any person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.