Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 La. 982 - State v. Kreller

State v. Kreller’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur (1973), State v. Shaffer (1971)

70 state decisions

60019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reese · State v. Johnson · State v. Maney · State v. Walker · State v. Haddad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to show intent, evidence is admissible of similar acts, independent of the act charged as a crime in the indictment, for though intent is a question of fact, it need not be proven as a fact, it may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction. (La.R.S. 15:445) When knowledge or intent forms an essential part of the inquiry, testimony may be offered of such acts, conduct or declarations of the accused as tend to establish such knowledge or intent and where the offense is one of a system, evidence is admissible to prove the continuity of the offense, and the commission of similar offenses for the purpose of showing guilty knowledge and intent. but not to prove the offense charged. (La.R.S. 15:446).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Res gestae are events speaking for themselves under the immediate pressure of the occurrence, through the instructive (instinctive), impulsive and spontaneous words and acts of the participants, and not the words of the participants when narrating the events. What forms any part of the res gestae is always admissible in evidence. (La. R.S. 15:447). To constitute res gestae the circumstances and declarations must be necessary incidents of the criminal act, or immediate concomitants of it, or form in conjunction with it one continuous transaction. (La.R.S. 15:448).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the judge, district attorney, or a court official, during the trial or in argument, refers directly or indirectly to: * * * * * * (2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.