Vitro Electronics v. Milgray Electronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 federal appellate · 18 district · 35 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““It seems clear that the purpose of the Legislature in enacting these new provisions was to give the courts of the State personal jurisdiction over all out of state persons and corporations which constitutionally could be reached as having had sufficient Maryland contacts, under the jurisdictional yardstick established by the Supreme Court in cases such as International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct. 154 , 90 L.Ed. 95 ; McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220 , 78 S.Ct. 199 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 ; and Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 .” 239 Md. at 111 , 210 A.2d at 392 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 321 F. Supp. 1067 - Piracci v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

2. ““[D]ue process requires only that in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Mohamed v. Michael

3. “[A] foreign corporation is not construed as doing business within a state merely because of its ownership of all of the shares of stock of another corporation doing business in the state.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.