Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Md. 98 - Spence v. Wiles

Spence v. Wiles’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2009 · most notably Bohnert v. State (1988), 29 Md. App. 1 - Brown v. State (1975)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

21019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Department of Health v. Walker · Nizer v. Phelps · Henkelmann v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Miller v. Graff · Cocco v. Lissau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is that before a witness is permitted to offer an expert opinion, it must be shown that he possesses both the necessary qualifications and also the factual information necessary to form such an opinion. * * * The qualifications of a proposed expert witness are a matter for the trial court to pass upon in the first instance, and unless such ruling is clearly erroneous or a clear abuse of discretion it will not be reversed on appeal.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““To show merely excessive speed is ordinarily not enough to support an inference of negligence unless there is some further showing that this excessive speed is a direct and proximate cause of the injury.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The rule is that before a witness is permitted to offer an expert opinion, it must be shown that he possesses both the necessary qualifications and also the factual information necessary to form such an opinion. . . . The qualifications of a proposed expert witness are a matter for the trial court to pass upon. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.