Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Mont. 231 - Dicken v. Shaw

Dicken v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2024

12 state decisions

601992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. K & S PARTNERSHIP · New Club Carlin, Inc. v. City of Billings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[plaintiff] has not shown, as would be necessary to justify a preliminary injunction under § 27-19-201(3), MCA, that renting the office space to another tenant during this litigation will tend to render the potential judgment ineffectual, because she has not shown that she has been damaged other than monetarily.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An injunction order may be granted in the following cases: (2) when it appears that the commission or continuance of some act during the litigation would produce a great or irreparable injury to the applicant ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.