Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 N.C. App. 719 - Green v. Green

255 N.C. App. 719 - Green v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Quick v. Quick · North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. Carroll · State v. Wilson · Stevenson v. City of Durham · Beall v. Beall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court abused its discretion in basing its decision regarding [the d]efendant's ability to pay alimony on an average of [the d]efendant's monthly gross income from prior years without first determining [the d]efendant's current monthly income, and whether that reported current income was credible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the trial court did not make findings of fact as to whether [the d]efendant's professed actual income at the time of the order was reliable or unreliable before basing its decision regarding [the d]efendant's ability to pay alimony on an average of prior years' income.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.