Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 N.C. App. 767 - State v. Bishop

255 N.C. App. 767 - State v. Bishop’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Garcia · State v. Roache · State v. Hart · State v. Haselden · State v. Grundler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] petition for the writ must show merit or that error was probably committed below.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutional arguments were barred on direct appeal because they were not preserved for appellate review.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “As our Supreme Court has instructed, we must be cautious in our use of Rule 2 not only because it is an extraordinary remedy intended solely to prevent manifest injustice, but also because inconsistent application of Rule 2 itself leads to injustice when some similarly situated litigants are permitted to benefit from it but others are not.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.