State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2025
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Craig · State v. Turner · State v. Alvarez · State v. Brown · State v. Lafler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) If such defendant is to be tried again following a mistrial, an order for a new trial, or an appeal or collateral attack, such period shall commence to run from the date of the mistrial, order granting a new trial, or the mandate on remand. (4) The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time for trial: (a) The period of delay resulting from other proceedings concerning the defendant, including but not limited to . .. the time from filing until final disposition of pretrial motions of the defendant....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f the term `proceedings' was read broadly, rather than in its `particular sense,' § 29-1207(4)(a) would include any delay at trial that `concerns' the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“as the statute specifically provides. However, once that application has been granted, no further application to a court of justice is required to obtain the depositions. State v. Murphy, 255 Neb. at 803-04 , 587 N.W.2d at 389 . For pretrial motions, the excluded time is from the filing of the motion under § 29-1207(4)(a) until its”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.