Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 N.J. Super. 108 - Fleming v. UPS

255 N.J. Super. 108 - Fleming v. UPS’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
5
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Gibson v. Superintendent of New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety-Division of State Police (2005), 190 W. Va. 126 - Courtney v. Courtney (1993)

2 federal appellate · 12 district · 19 state decisions

240199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Vaca v. Sipes · Imbler v. Pachtman · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Fleming cannot prove a lack of probable cause because the defendants' actions [in instituting the criminal proceeding for assault] were not unreasonable under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any reasonable person would have had probable cause to initiate criminal proceedings for theft against Fleming.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Fleming committed the acts complained of but that there was doubt, `although slight' of criminal intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.