255 N.J. Super. 228 - State v. Swed’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Indelicato v. United States · Musser v. States · Bullock v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · State v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“With the advent of computers has come an implicit trust in their dependability owing primarily to the results they achieve ... computer usage permeates every strata of society and is customary in modern life. [ State v. Swed, 255 N.J. Super. 228, 238-239 , 604 A. 2d 978 (App.Div. 1992).]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A writing offered as a memorandum or record of acts, conditions or events is admissible to prove the facts stated therein if the writing or the record upon which it is based was made in the regular course of a business, at or about the time of the act, condition or event recorded, and if the sources of information from which it was made and the method and circumstances of its preparation were such as to justify its admission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.