Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Pa. Super. 265 - Commonwealth v. Chapman

255 Pa. Super. 265 - Commonwealth v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably State v. Fain (1989), 280 Pa. Super. 417 - Commonwealth v. Pfender (1980)

28 state decisions

18019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Rochin v. People of California · Moore v. Illinois · Wardius v. Oregon · Haines v. Kerner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Society wins not only when the guilty are convicted but when criminal trials are fair ____ A prosecution that withholds evidence on demand of an accused____helps shape a trial that bears heavily on the defendant. That casts the prosecutor in the role of an architect of a proceeding that does not comport with standards of. justice, even though, as in the present case, his action is not 'the result of guile’____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.