Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Pa. Super. 587 - Commonwealth v. Guenzer

255 Pa. Super. 587 - Commonwealth v. Guenzer’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 296 Pa. Super. 441 - Commonwealth v. Miranda (1982), 282 Pa. Super. 354 - Commonwealth v. Eberts (1980)

28 state decisions

20019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Blair · Commonwealth v. Dancer · Commonwealth v. Walker · Commonwealth v. Williams · 223 Pa. Super. 60 - Commonwealth v. Lockhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant's specific complaint is that he did not know a jury was to be chosen from members of the community; however, during the colloquy, he answered the following question in the affirmative: "Do you understand that you have an absolute right to be tried by a jury of 12 of your peers, and in order for them to find you guilty, all 12 of them must unanimously agree that you are guilty of each and every charge and each and every element of each charge beyond a reasonable doubt; do you understand that?"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““While the better practice may be to elaborate on the meaning of the word peers, we do not consider a failure to do so to constitute ineffectiveness of counsel.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.