Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 SW3D 394 - Johnson v. Hawkins

Johnson v. Hawkins’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 193rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on City of Keller v. Wilson · Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Dow Chemical Co. v. Francis · Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis · EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the party's conduct was intentional or the result of conscious indifference is a question of fact to be determined by the trial court in its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A trial court abuses its discretion when it acts in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner, or when it acts without reference to any guiding principles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.