Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 U.S. 22 - Berger v. United States

Berger v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

255 U.S. 22 · 1921

Citation profile

1,537
cited by 1,537 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

598 federal appellate · 166 district · 228 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,537 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably Liteky et al United States (1994), United States v. Grinnell Corp. (1966)

598 federal appellate · 166 district · 228 state decisions — followed in 34 states

368019211930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte American Steel Barrel Co. · Glasgow v. Moyer · Henry v. Speer · Ex parte N. K. Fairbank Co.

Cited together with United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Ex parte American Steel Barrel Co. · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Liteky et al United States · Offutt v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,537 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must give fair support to the charge of a bent of mind that may prevent or impede impartiality of judgment.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]ribunals of the country shall not only be impartial in the controversies submitted to them but shall give assurance that they are impartial....”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.