Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 U.S. 224 - Baender v. Barnett

Baender v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis

255 U.S. 224 · 1921

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 11 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1936), Sorrells v. United States (1932)

56 federal appellate · 11 district · 26 state decisions

2901921193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Jin Fuey Moy · United States v. Kirby · Legal Tender Cases Knox v. Lee Parker · United States v. Field · The United States v. Peter Marigold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute is not intended to include and make criminal a possession which is not conscious and willing. While its words are general, they are to be taken in a reasonable sense, and not in one which works manifest injustice or infringes constitutional safeguards. In so holding we but give effect to a cardinal rule of construction recognized in repeated decisions of this and other courts.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A statute must be construed, if fairly possible, so as to avoid not only the conclusion that it is unconstitutional but also grave doubts upon that score.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a possession which is not conscious and willing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.