Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 U.S. 450 - Ex parte Riddle

Ex parte Riddle’s Empirical Analysis

255 U.S. 450 · 1921

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 1959
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 3 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1959 · most notably Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n (1943), Maryland v. Soper (1926)

24 federal appellate · 3 district · 15 state decisions

2501921193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nalle v. Oyster · Ex Parte the Park Square Automobile Station · Ex parte Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “He [appellant] might have saved the point by an exception at the trial or by a bill of exceptions to the denial of his subsequent motion, setting forth whatever facts or offers of proof were material, and then have brought a writ of error. Nolle v. Oyster, 230 U. S. 165 , 177. In such cases mandamus does not lie. Ordinarily, at least, it is not to be used when another statutory method has been provided for reviewing the action below, or to reverse a decision of record. Ex parte Morgan, 114 U. S. 174 ; Ex parte Park Square Automobile Station, 244 U. S. 412 , 414. In this case the facts were more or less clearly admitted at the argument but the record does not establish them and the extent of agreement or dispute with regard to them does not change the remedy to be sought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.