Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 255 Va. 198 - Supinger v. Stakes

Supinger v. Stakes’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Melendez (2000), Williams v. Williams (1998)

46 state decisions

230199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dimick v. Schiedt · Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc. · Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals · Pearson v. Yewdall · Smithey v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Language is ambiguous when it may be understood in more than one way, or simultaneously refers to two or more things.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`While in the construction of statutes the constant endeavor of the courts is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature, that intention must be gathered from the words used, unless a literal construction would involve a manifest absurdity. Where the legislature has used words of a plain and definite import the courts cannot put upon them a construction which amounts to holding the legislature did not mean what it has actually expressed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]ny `judgment as to the wisdom and propriety of a statute is within the legislative prerogative,' and this Court `will declare the legislative judgment null and void only when the statute is plainly repugnant to some provision of the state or federal constitution.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.