Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 A2D 268 - Vincent v. State

Vincent v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
5
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1995

8 state decisions

501969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Holt v. United States · Commonwealth v. Aljoe · State v. Heitter · State v. Norris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"To define the crimes is to demonstrate that they are two separate and distinct criminal offenses. The prosecution of one is, therefore, not barred by the prosecution of the other. In fact, these two offenses do not arise out of the same criminal act, for the burglary was completed upon the breaking and entering with the required intent, 1 and the rape took place thereafter." Vincent v. State , Del.Supr., 256 A.2d 268 , 271 (1969).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.