Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 A.2d 666 - State v. Barrett

State v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1997

14 state decisions

901969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Saba · State v. Rowe · Freije v. United States · State v. Dorathy · State v. Langley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the presumption is supported it must rest on the possessive conduct of Barrett in helping Wiley transport the set for purposes of sale. This conduct in the light of all the surrounding circumstances could be found to be an exercise of dominion, control, and right of disposal jointly with Wiley, or with Smith, or with both, soon after the larceny and amounts to the possession upon which a reasonable presumption of guilt can be founded_ The reasonability of this presumption leading to a justifiable conviction for larceny is significantly bolstered by the testimony, pointing directly to the felonious act, that contrary to the alibi evidence, Barrett was with Wiley ‘uptown’ at the time of the larceny.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`by the act of the party [defendant] or [with] his undoubted concurrence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.