Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 Ala. 593 - Upton v. Read

Upton v. Read’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2009

20 state decisions

80195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Bachus · Ray v. Richardson · Oliver v. Oliver · Alford v. Rodgers · Ford v. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]ecognition by adjoining owners of a false [government survey] line as the boundary between them is without effect, unless the party claiming beyond the true line also holds hostile possession up to the false line until the bar of the statute is complete.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.