Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 ARK 248 - Dolphus v. State

Dolphus v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1982
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Underwood v. State · Ridgeway v. State · Henderson v. State · State v. Springer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prosecuting attorney or other attorney representing the State, with leave of the court, may amend an indictment, as to matters of form, or may file a bill of particulars. But no indictment shall be amended, nor bill of particulars filed, so as to change the nature of the crime charged or the degree of the crime charged. All amendments and bills or particulars shall be noted of record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.