Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 ARK 721 - Moses v. Kirtley

Moses v. Kirtley’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Breitenberg v. Parker · Clark County Lumber Co. v. Collins · Fred's Dollar Store v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether a jury verdict is excessive the question is whether the verdict shocks the conscience of the court or demonstrates that the jurors were motivated by passion or prejudice. Moses, at 722-723.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We have many times said that precedents in cases of this kind are of scant value. This is because no two cases are identical; essential points of difference are usually apparent. Moses, at 722.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.