In Re Kazis’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307
Relies on Ogbomon v. United States · Fukutomi v. United States Trustee · Hammers v. Internal Revenue Service · Brockenbrough v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service · Guyther v. Hebb (In Re Hebb)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title. No provision of this title providing for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process. 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Fleury
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.