In Re Pincombe’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 524
Relies on General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc. · Bloom v. Bloom · Hardy v. United States ex rel. Internal Revenue Service · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rath Packing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.. .[A] petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title... operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of-(l) the commencement or continuation... of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.