256 Cal. App. 2d 13 - Robinson v. S & S Development’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 45 Cal. 2d 345 - Cole v. Rush · Alter v. Michael · Borchers Bros. v. Buckeye Incubator Co. · McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc. · 47 Cal. App. 2d 634 - Wells v. California Tomato Juice, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statute of limitations going to the remedy, rather than a limitation of a substantive right.” The language used in the Georgia lien statute is different from that used in the California lien statute in that it makes the 12-month filing requirement a prerequisite to . . make good the lien specified in Sections 67-2001.” (Emphasis supplied.) Upon failure to file within the 12-month period, our statute states that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the 90-day period for commencing proceedings for enforcement of mechanic’s liens provided by section 1198.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a statute of limitations affecting the remedy only which may be tolled by the provisions of section 11, subdivision (e), of the federal Bankruptcy Act,” or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.