State v. Berube’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Alves (2003), State v. Rivera (2004)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · State v. Golding · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Jenkins v. Anderson · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the absence of any indication in the record that the silence of a defendant had been preceded by a Miranda warning rendered Doyle inapplicable, even though the inquiry of the prosecutor pertained to the time of arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is essential to know the timing of these conversations because the use at trial of silence prior to the receipt of Miranda warnings does not violate due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.