Mary Lucille Sandidge v. Ralph J. Rogers 1’s Empirical Analysis
256 F.2d 269 · 1958
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1979
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · International Salt Co. v. United States · United States v. Griffith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is also elementary that a complaint is not subject to dismissal unless it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff cannot possibly be entitled to relief under any set of facts which could be proved in support of its allegations.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The supply of limestone is not sold in central markets as are potatoes, onions, corn, grain, fruit and berries * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sandidge v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.