Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 F.2d 545 - John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United States v. Sukejiro Katamoto

John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United States v. Sukejiro Katamoto’s Empirical Analysis

256 F.2d 545 · 1958

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2005

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

70195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kawakita v. United States · Nishikawa v. Dulles · Gonzales v. Landon · Jalbuena v. Dulles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) From and after the effective date of this chapter, a person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by— * * * * * “(3) entering, or serving in, the armed forces of a foreign state unless, prior to such entry or service, such entry or service is specifically authorized in writing by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense: Provided, That the entry into such service by a person prior to the attainment of his eighteenth birthday shall serve to expatriate such person only if there exists an option to secure a release from such service and such person fails to exercise such option at the attainment of his eighteenth birthday.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.