Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 F.2d 697 - Bernstein v. United States

Bernstein v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

256 F.2d 697 · 1958

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
8
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad (1986), Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. Maddoux (1982)

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

2101958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Jencks v. United States · United States v. Reynolds · Rex Trailer Company v. United States · United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party may also state as many separate claims or defenses as he has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or on equitable grounds or on both.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “rule of 'procedure or judicial administration.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[The election of remedies doctrine] has been consistently criticized as harsh and not a favorite of equity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.