Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

256 F.2d 893

Docket No. 13724.

James J. Laughlin v. Russell C. Harrington, Commissioner of Internal Revenue

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 14, 1958.

Decided May 29, 1958.

Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied August 25, 1958.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-05-29

3 counsel of record

Relies on Great Sweet Grass Oils, Ltd. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-05-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2000

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

30195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. James J. Laughlin, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se, with whom Mr. Albert J. Ahern, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

Messrs. Edward P. Troxell, Principal Asst. U. S. Atty., and Joseph M. F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., at the time record was filed, and Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered appearances for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant asked specific performance of an alleged contract of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to show appellant records, statements, reports, and other documentary evidence regarding a tax claim against appellant. Since these papers are the property of the United States, the suit is in substance against the United States. The United States has not consented to such a suit. We therefore affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint; of course without prejudice to any remedy appellant may have in the Tax Court where, counsel have informed us, a suit is pending.

¶2

Affirmed.

/256/f2d/893 · .json · Public domain