Unity Communications Corp. v. Cingular Wireless’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Hilti, Inc. v. Oldach · Price v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. · Subway Equipment Leasing Corp. v. Forte · General Guaranty Insurance v. New Orleans General Agency, Inc. · Republic Insurance Company v. Paico Receivables Llc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Cingular substantially invoked the judicial process by engaging in discovery, moving to dismiss, moving for summary judgment and taking an appeal to this Circuit before it gave Unity notice of its intent to seek arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tellez v. Madrigal“[W]e hold that the district court did not clearly err when it found that the time and expense required to respond to Cingular's motion for summary judgment prejudiced Unity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tellez v. Madrigal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.