256 F. Supp. 2d 377 - Davidson v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Neitzke v. Williams · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the individual defendants did not sign the Agreement . . . their status as agents of the Corporate Defendant enables them to use the Agreement to compel arbitration. “Such a finding also has the result of preventing an unwanted result: the circumvention of valid arbitration agreements by plaintiffs. If plaintiffs could sue individual defendants, they could too easily avoid the arbitration agreements that they signed with corporate entities.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.