Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 Ga. 585 - Crawford v. State

Crawford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably Coleman v. State (1999), 239 Ga. App. 524 - Inglett v. State (1999)

30 state decisions

1301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Sandstrom v. Montana · Hosch v. State · Spraggins v. State · Trenor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court’s ruling [on motion for mistrial] will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion, which does not exist if the curative instructions given can serve to prevent the alleged harmful testimony from having any prejudicial impact and/or the jury indicates that it can, follow the instructions and will not consider any improper prejudicial statements or testimony. [Cits.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where a witness for the State in a criminal case voluntarily injects into the trial improper and prejudicial matter, on motion for a mistrial based thereon, whether mistrial must be granted as the only corrective measure or whether the prejudicial effect can be corrected by withdrawing testimony from the consideration of the jury under proper instructions, is a matter ordinarily in the discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.