Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 Ga. App. 391 - Drew v. State

256 Ga. App. 391 - Drew v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. State · Dewberry v. State · Turner v. State · 242 Ga. App. 246 - Ward v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the quantum of corroboration need not in itself be sufficient to convict, but need only be that amount of independent evidence which tends to prove that the incident occurred as alleged. Slight circumstances may be sufficient for corroboration and the question of corroboration is one solely for the jury. If there is any evidence of corroboration, this court will not go behind the jury verdict and pass on its probative value. [10]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “when he or she threatens to commit any crime of violence ... with the purpose of terrorizing another... or in reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.